The people of Tamil Nadu are closely observing the strong opposition by some politicians to the National Education Policy (NEP 2020). This resistance appears to stem either from political motivations or a lack of understanding of the policy's full scope. It is disappointing and misleading to hear statements, such as the Chief Minister's claim that NEP is “poison.” Such remarks create unnecessary fear among parents and students.

A Visionary Education Reform
NEP 2020 is a transformative policy designed to align India's education system with global standards. It moves away from rote learning and fosters critical thinking, creativity, and national pride. This is India's first major education policy revision in 34 years, containing progressive measures to meet 21st-century challenges. Instead of criticizing it without due analysis, we must recognize its potential to uplift education in our country.

A strong and inclusive education policy is crucial for a diverse nation like India. NEP aims to equip students with skills needed for economic and social development. The policy grants states significant flexibility in implementation, ensuring adaptation to local needs.

Addressing Common Misconceptions
1. Imposition of Hindi: NEP does not mandate Hindi learning. It encourages mother tongue or regional language-based education and allows states to choose their language policies.
2. Trilingual Policy: The policy offers students an opportunity to learn an additional language, enhancing their skills. Private and CBSE schools already follow this approach. Learning multiple languages is an asset, not a burden.
3. Board Exams for Grades 3, 5, and 8: These assessments are meant to gauge learning levels, not filter students. They help improve teaching methods and do not affect students' progression.
4. Vocational Education as “Caste-Based Education”: Vocational training enhances employability, self-esteem, and social mobility. In India, only 10% of youth receive vocational education, compared to much higher percentages in countries like Germany and Japan. This reform is essential for economic growth.
5. Federalism and State Rights: NEP was formulated through extensive consultations across states, ensuring broad participation. It is a guideline, not a mandatory directive, allowing states to modify it as needed.
6. Social Justice: The policy emphasizes inclusive education, providing scholarships, gender inclusion funds, and special support for marginalized communities.
7. Reservation in Education: Though not explicitly mentioned, NEP does not alter existing reservation policies. The Union Education Minister has assured that reservations will continue as per constitutional provisions.
8. Autonomy and Commercialization: Autonomy enhances institutional excellence, not commercialization. The policy includes safeguards to prevent financial misuse while allowing academic freedom.
9. Private Institutions' Role: Private participation is essential to meet enrollment targets. With a goal of 100% school enrollment by 2030 and 50% higher education participation by 2035, private institutions play a critical role.
10. Feasibility of Implementation: Effective implementation requires cooperation from all stakeholders, particularly state governments and educational institutions.

Consequences of Non-Implementation
States that reject NEP may face challenges in improving education quality, securing research funding, and aligning with national accreditation bodies like UGC and AICTE. Tamil Nadu must adopt a constructive approach to benefit from NEP's progressive reforms.

The National Education Policy is not a threat but a vital reform for India's educational future. With thoughtful adaptation, Tamil Nadu can ensure its students receive world-class education, empowering them for a brighter future.


--Prof. E. Balagurusamy, Former VC, Anna University, Chennai & Former Member, Union Public Service Commission, New Delhi